INCA Executive Chairman, Mitch Gee
Why INCA, why now?
I have recently taken on the role of INCA Executive Chairman. I will be working for you – our members, to deliver our vision and strategy over the coming months. In practice that means engaging current members, recruiting new members and engaging with our myriad stakeholders. It also means doing what we do so well around provision of technical support, sharing best practice, and further raising the profile of INCA – as the body that upholds standards in EWI.
In 2016, I wrote the blog post, ‘Vision for the EWI Industry’ and said that “quality had to be at the heart of everything we do in the External Wall Insulation sector.” Eighteen months on, the same is true, now more than ever. We are in a place of opportunity, where decisive leadership and proper representation are key to our success. INCA is ready and able to provide this to its members.
The EWI sector faces unprecedented challenges. We, in construction owe it to the people who lost their lives in the Grenfell tragedy to learn the lessons of what went wrong, and to evolve our practice to ensure that we uphold the strictest safety standards. And beyond that, as INCA members we must ensure our voice is heard in promoting EWI, and utilise the huge benefits that we can offer our clients.
There is no denying that this is a challenging time for INCA and its members, but there is undoubtedly huge opportunity. I am optimistic that we can grow the Association and deliver our vision of: “Exclusively representing the external wall insulation industry”.
We would love to hear what you, our members want from your trade association.
Please get in touch
Managing Director, Bevan Jones (Sustainable Homes)
Original Blog: http://www.sustainablehomes.co.uk
The Bonfield Review – Each Home Counts, snuck out in December to as much fanfare as you could expect on a Friday afternoon a week before Christmas. The outcomes of Dr Peter Bonfield’s review have been long awaited. The much delayed report has been eagerly anticipated, but a quick reminder of the scope of the review is needed:
When choosing to install energy efficiency or renewable energy measures in their homes, consumers rely on a framework of standards to ensure that they are protected and get a good quality outcome.
…This review will draw together evidence in relation to weaknesses in the existing framework of standards and propose how it can be made more robust for consumers, while encouraging investment and promoting innovation.
The review will cover the following issues:
- Consumer advice and protection: what supports consumers’ decisions ahead of an installation and what assistance is available when things go wrong?
- Standards framework: what ensures that the right products are fitted to the right properties in the right way during the installation?
- Monitoring and enforcement: what ensures that poor quality work is dealt with effectively, and do the arrangements for audit, compliance-checking and sanctions provide sufficient assurance of this?
Chief Executive Officer, Gearoid Lane (Agility Eco)
AgilityEco has been proud to support INCA in championing the Solid Wall Industry’s cause with government. We recently supported INCA in formulating its response to the ECO “Help to Heat” consultation and over the course of that work we spent time with a number of BEIS officials and analysts to really understand, and question, BEIS’s assessment. AgilityEco and INCA’s shared message has been crystal clear from the outset: solid walled homes, which house many of Britain’s poorest and most vulnerable residents MUST be prioritised in government energy efficiency policy.
As we’ve said previously, we see SWI as the key to combating fuel poverty. There are more than 8 million solid walled homes in Britain, a third of all of our housing. Nearly half of those in fuel poverty live in solid walled houses. Uninsulated solid wall properties are highly inefficient, typically leaking twice as much heat as cavity walls, resulting in extremely high fuel bills for their occupants. SWI therefore delivers huge benefits for those living in solid wall homes (average annual savings of £490 per annum compared to £140 for cavity wall insulation), benefits that have not been delivered at any scale under successive supplier obligations, despite these households contributing hugely to the cost of those schemes. Moreover, owners (particularly social landlords and private householders) have been willing to make significant contributions to the cost of SWI works, keeping the cost to all energy bill payers down. SWI results in significant job creation, delivers huge benefits to the exchequer (multiplier effect), whilst providing significant social and housing regeneration benefits.